Â鶹ÒùÔº

2022

Arehart, K.H., Chon, S.H., Lundberg, E.M.H., Harvey, L.O., Kates, J.M., Anderson, M.C., Rallapalli, V.H, & Souza, P.E.Ìý (2022).ÌýÌý A comparison of speech intelligibility and subjective quality with hearing-aid processing in older adults with hearing loss.ÌýÌý International Journal of Audiology 61 (1), 46-58.

2021

2020

Lundberg, E., Chon, S.H., Kates, J.M., Anderson, M.C., Arehart, K.H. (2020). The type of noise influences quality ratings for noisy speech in hearing aid users. Accepted for publication in the Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing ResearchÌý63Ìý(12), 4300-4313

Rallapalli, V., Anderson, M.C., Kates, J.M., Balmert, L., Sirow, L. Arehart, K.H., Souza, P. (2020).Ìý Quantifying the range of signal modification in clinically fit hearing aids.ÌýÌý Ear and Hearing 41(2), 433-441.

2019

Kates, J. M. (2019). Limitations of the envelope cifference index as a metric for nonlinear distortion in hearing aids. Ear and Hearing.Ìý

Kates, J. M., Arehart, K. H., & Harvey, L. O. (2019). Integrating a remote microphone with hearing-aid processing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(6), 3551.Ìý

Rallapalli, V., Anderson, M., Kates, J., Balmert, L., Sirow, L., Arehart, K., & Souza, P. (2019). Quantifying the range of signal modification in clinically fit hearing aids. Ear and Hearing.Ìý

Souza, P., Arehart, K., Schoof, T., Anderson, M., Strori, D., & Balmert, L. (2019). Understanding variability in individual response to hearing aid signal processing in wearable hearing aids. Ear and Hearing.

2018

Anderson, M.C., Rallapalli, V. Schoof, T., Souza, P. Arehart, K.H.ÌýÌý (2018). The use of self-report measures to examine changes in perception in response to fittings using different signal processing parameters. International Journal of Audiology 57(11), 809-815.

Kates, J.M., Arehart, K.H. Muralimanohar, R.K., & Sommerfeldt, K. (2018).Ìý Externalization of remote microphone signals using a structural binaural model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143(5), 2666-2677.

Kates, J.M., Arehart, K.H., Anderson, M.C., Muralimanohar R.K. & Harvey, L.O. (2018). Using objective metrics to measure hearing aid performance. Ear and Hearing 39(6), 1165-1175.

Anderson, M.C., Arehart, K.H., & Souza, P.E. (2018). Survey of current practice in the fitting and fine-tuning of common signal-processing features in hearing aids for adults.Ìý Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 29(2) 118-124.

2017

Muralimanohar, R.K., Kates, J.M. and Arehart, K.H. (2017). Using envelope modulation to explain speech intelligibility in the presence of a single reflection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 141(5), EL482-EL487. DOI: 10.1121/1.4983630.

Jin, I.K., Kates, J.M., and Arehart, K.H. (2017).Ìý Sensitivity of the Speech Intelligibility Index to the assumed dynamic range.Ìý Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 60(6) 1674-1680.

Jin, I,K., Kates, J.M., and Arehart, K.H. (2017).Ìý Does language matter when using a graphical method for calculating the Speech Intelligibility Index? Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 28(2), 119-126.

2016

Croghan, N.B.H., Swanberg, A.M., Anderson, M.C., Arehart, K.H.Ìý (2016).Ìý Chosen listening levels for music with and without the use of hearing aids. American Journal of Audiology 25(3), 161-166.

Shen, J., Anderson, M.C., Arehart, K.H., and Souza, P. (2016).Ìý Using cognitive screening tests in audiology.Ìý American Journal of Audiology, 25(4) 319-331.

Kates, J.M. and Arehart, K.H. (2016).The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI).Ìý IEEE-ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language 24 (2) 354-365.

Ìý

2015

Kates, J.M. & Arehart, K.H. (2015).ÌýÌý Comparing the information conveyed by envelope modulation for speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138, 2470. Ìý

Arehart, K.H., Souza, P.E., Kates, J.M., Lunner, T., & Pedersen, M.S. (2015).Ìý Relationship between distortion, hearing loss, and working memory for digital noise reduction. Ear & Hearing 36(5): 505-516.

Falk, T.H., Parsa,V., Santos, J.F., Arehart, K.H., Hazrati, O., Huber, R., Kates, J.M., & Scollie S. (2015). Objective quality and intelligibility prediction for users of assistive listening devices. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 32(2):114-124.

Jin, I.K., Kates J.M, Lee, K., & Arehart KH. (2015). Derivations of the band-importance function: A cross-procedure comparison. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138(2):938. .

Souza, P.E. & Arehart, K.H. (2015). ÌýRobust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise. International Journal of Audiology 54(10):705-13.

Souza, P.E., Arehart, K.H., Shen, J., Anderson, M.C., & Kates, J.M. (2015).Ìý Working memory and intelligibility of hearing-aid processed speech. Frontiers in Psychology 6:526.

2014

Anderson, M.C., Arehart, K.H., & Kates, J.M. (2014). The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception. Hearing Research 309:75-83.

Arehart, K.H., Croghan, N.B.H., Muralimanohar, R.K. (2014). Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing. Ear and Hearing 35(2):195-202.

Arehart, K.H., Kates, J.M., Souza, P. (2014).Ìý The role of metrics in studies of hearing and cognition. ENT Audiology News 23(3):92-93. PMCID: PMC4459607.

Croghan, N.B.H., Arehart, K.H., & Kates, J.M. (2014). Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics. Ear and Hearing 35(5):e170-184.

Jin, I.K., Kates, J.M., & Arehart, K.H. (2014). Dynamic range for speech materials in Korean, English, and Mandarin: a cross-language comparison. Journal of Speech Hearing Language Research 57(5):2024-30.

Kates, J.M. &Ìý Arehart, K.H. (2014). The hearing aid speech perception index (HASPI). Speech Communication 65, 75-93. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2014.06.002Ìý

Kates, J.M.& Arehart, K.H. (2014). The hearing aid speech quality index (HASQI) version 2. Journal of Audio Engineering Society 62(3), 99-117.

2013

Arehart, K.H., Souza, P.E., Baca, R.L. & Kates, J.M. (2013).Ìý Age, hearing loss and cognition: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion. Ear and Hearing 34(3), 251-260.

Kates, J.M., Arehart, K.H., Souza, P.E. (2013).Ìý Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134(6):4458.

Portnuff, C.D.F., Fligor, B.J., Arehart, K.H. (2013). New measurement techniques for portable listening devices: technical report. Journal of Audio Engineering Society. 61(10), 749-754.Ìý

Portnuff, C.D.F., Fligor, B.J., Arehart, K.H. (2013). Self-report and long-term field measures of MP3 player use: how accurate is self-report? ÌýInternational Journal of Audiology 52 Suppl 1:S33-40. ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Souza P.E., Arehart, K.H., Kates, J.M., Croghan, N.B.H., Gehani N. (2013). Exploring the limits of frequency lowering. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research 56(5):1349-63.

2012

Croghan, N.B.H., Arehart, K.H., Kates, J.M. (2012). Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132(2):1177-88.

Jin, I.K., Kates, J.M., Arehart, K.H. (2012). The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132(4):EL277-83.

2011

Arehart, K.H., Kates, J.M., Anderson, M.C. (2011). Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality. International Journal of Audiology 50(3):177-90.

Arehart, K.H., Kates, J.M., Anderson, M.C., Moats, P. (2011). Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal. Ear and Hearing 32(4):533-5.

Arehart, K.H., Souza, P.E., Miller, C., Muralimanohar, R.K. (2011). ÌýEffects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research 54(1):190-210.

Portnuff, C.D.F., Fligor, B., Arehart, K.H. (2011). Teenage use of portable listening devices: a hazard to hearing? Journal of American Academy of Audiology 22(10):663–77.

Rossi-Katz, J.A. & Arehart K.H. (2011). Survey of audiological service provision to older adults with cochlear implants. American Journal of Audiology 20(2):84-9.

Souza P.E., Arehart K.H., Miller C. & Muralimanohar R.K. (2011).Ìý Effects of age on F0-discrimination and intonation perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing. Ear and Hearing 32(1):75-83.

Ìý

2010

Arehart K.H., Kates J.M., & Anderson M.C. (2010). Effects of noise, nonlinear processing and linear filtering on perceived speech quality. Ear and Hearing 31(3), 420-36.

Kates J.M. & Arehart K.H. (2010). Hearing-aid speech quality index (HASQI). J Audio Eng Soc. 58(5), 363-381.Ìý

2009

Anderson M.C., Arehart K.H. & Kates J.M. (2009). The acoustic and perceptual effects of series and parallel processing. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. (10).

Rossi-Katz J. & Arehart K.H. (2009). Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers voices and meaningfulness of the competing message. Journal of Speech, Language Hearing Research 52(2):435-53.

2008 and Earlier

Arehart K.H., Kates J.M., Anderson M.C., & Harvey L.O.(2007). ÌýEffects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122(2):1150-64.

Hansen J.H.L, Radhakrishnan V., & Arehart K.H. (2006). Speech enhancement based on generalized minimum mean square error estimators and masking properties of the auditory system. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio, Speech, Language Process. 14(6), 2049-2063.

Arehart K.H., Rossi-Katz J., & Swensson J. (2005). Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research 48(1):236-52. )

Kates J.M. & Arehart K.H. (2005). Coherence and the speech intelligibility index. Ìý(2005). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117(4 Pt 1):2224-37.

Kates J.M. & Arehart K.H. (2005). Multi-channel dynamic-range compression using digital frequency warping. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 18, 3003-3014.

Natarajan A., Hansen J.H.L., Arehart K.H., &Ìý Rossi-Katz J. (2005). An auditory masked threshold based noise suppression algorithm GMMSE-AMT[ERB] for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. EURASIP J Appl Signal Processing 18, 2938-2953.

Rossi-Katz, J. &Arehart, K.H. (2005). Effects of cochlear hearing loss on perceptual grouping cues in competing vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118(4):2588-98.

Arehart, K.H., Hansen, J.H.L, Gallant, S., Kalstein L. (2003). Evaluation of an auditory-masked-threshold noise suppression algorithm in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Stredler-Brown, A., Arehart, K.H. (2000). Universal newborn hearing screening: impact on early intervention services. Volta Review 100(5), 85-117.

Arehart K.H. & Burns E.M. (1999). A comparison of monotic and dichotic complex-tone pitch perception in listeners with hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106(2):993-7.

Arehart, K.H. & Rosengard, P.F. (1999). Psychometric functions for discrimination of two-component complex tones in listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105(4):2454-65.

Arehart, K.H, Yoshinaga-Itano, C. (1999). The role of educators of the deaf in the early identification of hearing loss. American Ann Deaf. 144(1):19-23.

Arehart, K.H. (1998). Effects of high-frequency amplification on double-vowel perception in listeners with hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104(3 Pt 1):1733-6.Ìý doi: 10.1121/1.423619Ìý

Arehart, K.H., Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Gabbard, S., Stredler-Brown, A., Thomson, V. (1998). State of the states: Status of universal newborn hearing screening, assessment and intervention in 17 states. American Journal Audiology 7, 101-111.Ìý

Scherer, R.C., Arehart, K.H., Guo, C.G., Milstein, C.F., Horii, Y. (1998). Just noticeable differences for glottal flow waveform characteristics. Journal of Voice. 12(1):21-30.

Arehart, K.H., King, C.A., Mudgett, K. (1997). Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of competing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research 40(6):1434-44.

Arehart, K.H. (1994). Effects of harmonic content on complex-tone fundamental frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95(6):3574-85.

Burns, E.M., Campbell, S.L., Arehart, K.H. (1994). Longitudinal measurements of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95(1):385-94.

Keefe, D.H., Bulen, J.C., Arehart, K.H., Burns, E.M. (1993). Ear canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94(5):2617-38.

Burns, E.M., Arehart, K.H., Campbell, S.L. (1992). Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91(3):1571-5.

Arehart, K.H., Burns, E.M., Schlauch, R.S. (1990). ÌýA comparison of psychometric functions for detection in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal Speech Hearing Research 33(3):433-9.

Dobie, R.A., Hoberg, K.E., Rees, T.S. (1986). Electrical tinnitus suppression: a double-blind crossover study. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery 95(3 Pt 1):319-23.