麻豆淫院

By Joe Arney

Whether you consider the Second Amendment a dangerous relic or inspiration for a tattoo, the U.S. public as a whole doesn鈥檛 consider guns an important issue, except in the immediate wake of a mass shooting.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a little depressing that only 8 percent of America thinks guns are an important issue,鈥� said Chris Vargo, an associate professor of advertising and information analytics at the University of Colorado Boulder鈥檚 College of Media, Communication and Information. 鈥淚t makes it obvious to me that, with this much disinterest, gun control isn鈥檛 going to happen at the national level.鈥�

Vargo鈥檚 research, which was , looked at agenda setting and gun control to better understand whether public sentiment around guns is strong enough to pressure legislators into taking action. He studied the impacts of traditional and partisan media coverage, posts on Twitter (now X), gun-related events, and Google search behavior to understand how important Americans consider guns against the broader tapestry of challenges facing the nation.

Long story short, they don鈥檛. Vargo鈥檚 dataset goes back to 2015, and you can easily point out where devastating mass shootings like Parkland, Uvalde and even Boulder took place鈥攖here are spikes in Google searches for terms like 鈥渟econd amendment rights,鈥� 鈥渃oncealed carry permit鈥� and 鈥渟andy hook donations.鈥�

But a spike is all it is. Particularly among conservatives, interest in guns and gun control quickly heads back to its baseline. And even in the immediate wake of the gruesome Parkland shootings, only about 30 percent of Americans considered guns an important issue.

鈥淚 expected to see a ramp on this across time鈥攎ore and more interest as more people are shot, or as more people know people who are killed in mass shootings,鈥� Vargo said. 鈥淚nstead, it just resets.鈥�

A zero-sum game

He admitted surprise at his findings, but as an expert on agenda setting, maybe he shouldn鈥檛 be. Scholars who study agenda setting look for ways that the news media plays an outsized role in determining what issues we find important. It鈥檚 particularly of interest for people in mass communications鈥攍ike journalists, advertisers, PR experts and content creators鈥攖o ensure their work is more likely to generate audience interest.

鈥淎genda setting is a zero-sum game,鈥� Vargo said. 鈥淲e can only keep maybe five major national issues in our head at one time鈥攁nd while some topics, like the economy, are always going to be there, for something new to rise to the top, something else has to come out.鈥�

Guns are a new direction for Vargo鈥檚 work on media effects and agenda setting, which traditionally looks at everything from fact-checking and fake news to how we choose media to form a community around like-minded people. This topic was less about a new direction and more a reaction to how unimportant guns are to Americans. Survey data list guns as a top-25 problem鈥攊n other words, invisible. 听

Google Trends proved to be a rich source for understanding salience around guns. Surprisingly, that wasn鈥檛 true of the mainstream news media, which had almost no effect on the issue. Instead, partisan players on both the left and right鈥攖hink the likes of Wonkette or Breitbart鈥攄rive interest, though that polarization comes with an interesting twist of its own: Right-aligned media barely move the needle, while progressive publications get a boost from conservatives who flock there after shootings.

Vargo called this 鈥渃ounter-attitudinal thinking.鈥�

鈥淲hen conservatives see the left is crying about something, it signals that it鈥檚 an important issue to me, but only in the sense that I鈥檓 going to refute it,鈥� he said.

Looking at issue salience is important because when a topic does reach a certain threshold, the government tends to act. Vargo pointed to gay marriage as one issue where attention built consistently over a long period, leading to same-sex marriages being legalized in 2015. As more people realized they knew gay couples over time, it helped create momentum for the issue. 听

Gun control, though, 鈥渋s really unusual, because we just don鈥檛 have a lasting memory for shootings,鈥� Vargo said. 鈥淲e have this psychological desire to push out bad news, which helps keep gun control out of the spotlight.鈥�

It鈥檚 why he鈥檚 sure we鈥檒l never see action at the federal level, though he didn鈥檛 rule out the idea of local legislation.

鈥淕uns aren鈥檛 an intrusive issue until they are,鈥� Vargo said. 鈥淏ut unless you have something like a Parkland every day, you鈥檙e not moving a bunch of senators to take action. In those communities traumatized by gun violence, you might see local and state policies enacted to protect us.鈥�