The startling rise of drone technology in recent years has been enthusiastically embraced and put to work on numerous applications, but the industry is not without its detractors.聽
Distrust surrounding the use of military drones, repeated near-collisions with manned aircraft in federal airspace, and privacy and safety concerns raised by surveillance drones has led to a raft聽of federal legislation in recent years, which in some cases blindsided the industry.聽Communication was minimal between lawmakers and those using, designing and manufacturing drone technology, resulting in legislation that many describe as reactionary.
Jill Dupr茅, associate director of ATLAS Institute, hopes to reshape the dialogue by leveraging the University of Colorado Boulder鈥檚 expertise in aerospace, law and policy with support from a $44,000 CU Innovative Seed Grant Program (IGP).聽
The program focuses on innovative, interdisciplinary research that will involve policymakers, unmanned aircraft system (UAS) researchers at CU鈥揃oulder and members of the law community, raising questions like, 鈥淗ow/when do engineers make decisions on privacy, security, and safety when building UAS? Do engineers in academic and industry settings have similar incentives to consider these values? How do current regulatory systems impact innovation in UAS?鈥澛�
鈥淏y bringing together the proponents of UAS technology with those concerned about its numerous potential abuses,鈥� says Dupr茅, 鈥渨e can shape a regulatory environment that incentivizes innovation, while safeguarding privacy and safety. A model where policy is crafted alongside new technologies is simply smarter and more efficient.鈥�
